COMPARISON
CultureIQ Labs vs. Doing Nothing
The real competitor for 80%+ of prospects is not another software product. It is the belief that the insurer handles RTW and engagement surveys handle culture.
$1.2M+
Annual disability cost per 250 employees
52 days
Average mental health absence
0
Organizations measuring workplace conditions systematically
Feature by feature.
See how CultureIQ Labs compares to the tools you already have.
What The Status Quo does well.
The status quo is comfortable. The insurer manages claims. HR runs annual surveys. Managers improvise. It feels like the system is working — until disability costs rise, turnover spikes, or a regulator asks how you're measuring psychosocial hazards. The comfort of doing nothing is real. The cost is also real.
Where CultureIQ Labs wins.
CultureIQ Labs fills the employer-side gap the insurer was never built to fill. The insurer sees the claim. CultureIQ Labs sees the conditions. Supervisor behaviour and workplace psychosocial conditions predict RTW success more reliably than diagnosis type or claim duration. That's peer-reviewed. The insurer has no visibility into these variables. Neither does the employer — because they've never had a tool for it.
WHAT YOUR INSURER NEVER SEES
20 risk factors. 5 domains. One case score.
The insurer coordinates the claim. CultureIQ Labs scores the workplace conditions that predict whether the employee comes back — and stays.
3.7
Composite Risk Score
20 factors · 5 domainsThe insurer is coordinating your claim. Who is coordinating your workplace?
— CultureIQ Labs competitive positioning
See the difference yourself.
Book a research conversation. We'll show you what team-level data reveals.